Medicine Tips & Treatment

Hair Falling 
Falling out of the hair is a frequent sequel of acute diseases, especially fevers. But then the loss is only temporary, and it grows again when convalescence is complete. Early loss of hair is often constitutional and hereditary, and sometimes it is due to affection of the hair bulbs by disease. Ringworm rarely attacks the scalp of adults, though it does occur on the face and body. There is, however, a disease in which the hair falls out in spots (Alopecia areata), Usually the hair grows again as vigorously as before. Other major known causes are ph imbalanced shampoo and detergents, poor scalp hygiene, stress is major psychological factor, Hormonal imbalance, Hard Water and allergies. 

Common Cold & Allergic Rhinitis:

To prevent recurrent attack of Common Cold & allergic RhinitisRx Quilla Saponaria 30 4 pills (30 no. globule) 3 times a day for 1 to 3 days than wait for a week, if needed repeat after 2 or 3 month.

Pain in Back after Delivery due to injury to spine :

Rx Hypericum 30 4 pills (30 no. globule) 3 times a day for 1 to 2 days than wait for a week, if needed repeat after 2 or 3 month

Carcinoma tail of Pancreas :

Rx Calc Ars 30 4 pills (30 no. globule) only once, if needed repeat after 1 month.

Constipation:
Rx Nux Vomica 30 4 pills (30 no. globule) Before going to sleep at night for 4 days, if needed repeat after 1 month.

Tobacco Addiction :

Rx Caladium 30 4 pills (30 no. globule) early in the morning or soon after waking every alternate day till it creates aversion for same. This medicine have capacity to throw away cravings for tobacco.

Alcohol Addiction :

Rx Quercus Q 2 Oz 30 to 45 drops in 450 ml of alcohol. This medicine produces disgust for alcohol. Continue till it creates aversion for alcohol. Results come 15 days after taking it in alcohol.

Anxiety Disorder :

Rx Gelsemium 30 4 pills (30 no. globule) 3 times a day for 1 to 2 days or symptom subsides, if needed repeat it. Anxiety For Business : Bryonia 200 4 pills (30 no. globule) once a week for 2 to 3 weeks.

Read More!

Research on Homeopathy: State of the Art

Harald Walach, Ph.D.

University College Northampton, UK.

University Hospital Freiburg, Germany.

Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA.

Wayne B. Jonas, M.D., Ph.D.

Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA.

John Ives, Ph.D.

Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA.

Roel Van Wijk, Ph.D.

International Institute of Biophysics, Neuss, Germany.

Otto Weingärtner Dr.Phil.Nat.

Dr. Reckeweg & Co. GmbH, Bensheim, Germany.

In this paper, we review research on homeopathy from four perspectives, focusing on reviews and some landmark studies. These perspectives are laboratory studies, clinical trials, observational studies, and theoretical work. In laboratory models, numerous effects and anomalies have been reported. However, no single model has been sufficiently widely replicated. Instead, researchers have focused on ever-new models and experiments, leaving the picture of scattered anomalies without coherence. Basic research, trying to elucidate a purported difference between homeopathic remedies and control solutions has also produced some encouraging results, but again, series of independent replications are missing. While there are nearly 200 reports on clinical trials, few series have been conducted for single conditions. Some of these series document clinically useful effects and differences against placebo and some series do not. Observational research into uncontrolled homeopathic practice documents consistently strong therapeutic effects and sustained satisfaction in patients. We suggest that this scattered picture has to do with the fourth line of research: lack of a good theory. Some of the extant theoretical models are reviewed, including placebo, water structure, silica contamination, energy models, and entanglement models.

Read More!

The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Harald Walach, Ph.D.,University College Northampton, UK., University Hospital Freiburg, Germany., Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA.,Wayne B. Jonas, M.D., Ph.D.,Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA., John Ives, Ph.D.,Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA.,Roel Van Wijk, Ph.D.,International Institute of Biophysics, Neuss, Germany.,Otto Weingärtner Dr.Phil.Nat.

Dr. Reckeweg & Co. GmbH, Bensheim, Germany.

In this paper, we review research on homeopathy from four perspectives, focusing on reviews and some landmark studies. These perspectives are laboratory studies, clinical trials, observational studies, and theoretical work. In laboratory models, numerous effects and anomalies have been reported. However, no single model has been sufficiently widely replicated. Instead, researchers have focused on ever-new models and experiments, leaving the picture of scattered anomalies without coherence. Basic research, trying to elucidate a purported difference between homeopathic remedies and control solutions has also produced some encouraging results, but again, series of independent replications are missing. While there are nearly 200 reports on clinical trials, few series have been conducted for single conditions. Some of these series document clinically useful effects and differences against placebo and some series do not. Observational research into uncontrolled homeopathic practice documents consistently strong therapeutic effects and sustained satisfaction in patients. We suggest that this scattered picture has to do with the fourth line of research: lack of a good theory.

Read More!